One of the many sources of renewable energy being debated about is nuclear energy. Ever since World War II we have feared this, but have studies proven our fears irrelevant? In fact, these same studies show that nuclear energy exposure, in small doses is practically harmless. If so, what is the hold up on using nuclear energy as a renewable source of energy?
While some studies show that even the smallest amounts of nuclear exposure have serious health consequences, this particular one states that, out of the 10,929 people exposed to nuclear weapons who got cancer, only 527 actually got it because of this reason. This, among much more scientific evidence, is why we are so controversial on the topic of nuclear energy. There are a handful of people who believe this might be the only solution to the growing issue of global warming. Still, the common civilians have yet to overcome their fears of the power nuclear energy has. However, the civilian fears haven't kept scientists and engineers from planning out safer, reliable nuclear power plants. What do you think the next step into finding a renewable energy source should be?
For more information about these experiments and the article, check out: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/22/opinion/fear-vs-radiation-the-mismatch.html
Next Week: California Drought
No comments:
Post a Comment